top of page
Search

Unpacking the Controversy: Talcum Powder, Ovarian Cancer, and the Cosmetic Industry


VARFA's Commitment to Women's Health:
 

As VARFA, the Vaccine Awareness Raising Foundation Africa, we are dedicated to fighting cervical cancer by promoting HPV vaccination. Recognizing the interconnected nature of women's health issues, we understand the importance of addressing ovarian and uterine cancers as well. With our platform, we aim to contribute to the broader conversation on women's health, advocating for preventive measures and fostering awareness for a healthier future.

 

Acknowledgment to Sebastian Aristizabal:

 

We extend our gratitude to Sebastian Aristizabal from Drugwatch.com for suggesting and encouraging VARFA's collaboration in raising awareness about uterine and ovarian cancer in connection with talcum powder use. Sebastian's dedication to this cause has been instrumental, and we appreciate the opportunity to work together in spreading this crucial message.

 

Introduction:

Talcum powder, a seemingly innocuous household staple, has found its way into millions of bathrooms across the globe. Widely recognized for its use in personal hygiene and cosmetic routines, talcum powder has, however, become entangled in a controversial narrative that links its application to an increased risk of ovarian cancer. In this blog, we delve into the scientific discourse, legal battles, and regulatory landscape surrounding talcum powder, aiming to shed light on the complex relationship between this common product and a potentially devastating health concern.

 

Talcum Powder Composition and Cosmetic Uses:

At its core, talcum powder consists of the mineral talc, a soft, naturally occurring substance often lauded for its moisture-absorbing properties. The cosmetic industry, a multibillion-dollar enterprise, heavily relies on talc for products such as blush, bronzer, concealer, eyebrow pencil, eyeliner, eye shadow, face masks, face powder, foundation, lipstick, lotion, mascara, moisturizing cream, and rouge. Cosmetic uses of talc date back centuries, with Egyptians and Chinese civilizations incorporating it into their beauty practices.

 

Asbestos-Contaminated Talc in Makeup:

Talc and asbestos, both naturally occurring minerals, can form near one another beneath the Earth's surface, heightening the risk of asbestos-contaminated talc finding its way into makeup products. Recent tests by the Scientific Analytical Institute and the Environmental Working Group in 2020 revealed asbestos in cosmetic products, including eye shadow palettes and a toy makeup kit marketed to children. In 2018, Claire's and Justice, major retailers, faced recalls and bankruptcy declarations due to high levels of asbestos in their makeup products.

 

Health Risks Associated with Genital Use:

The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer flags the genital use of talcum powder as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Studies indicate a 30% to 60% increased risk of ovarian cancer with long-term genital talcum powder use. Researchers have found talc particles embedded in ovarian and cervical tumors of long-time users, with claims linking talcum powder to mesothelioma and other cancers.

 

Research and Findings:

 

Studies on talc without asbestos fibers suggest a possible carcinogenic impact on human perineal use. While some studies found talc particles in cancerous tumors, others have not conclusively linked talcum powder to cancer, presenting a nuanced landscape of research outcomes.

 

Dr. Daniel W. Cramer's Research:

Dr. Daniel W. Cramer, a prominent epidemiologist, has conducted extensive research exploring the link between talcum powder use and ovarian cancer. His studies have indicated a correlation between long-term talcum powder use in the genital area and an increased risk of ovarian cancer, particularly in women of various ethnic backgrounds. Cramer's findings have contributed significantly to the scientific understanding of this complex issue, sparking further investigation and debate within the medical community.

 
FDA Office of Women's Health Funding (2016):

In 2016, the FDA's Office of Women's Health allocated funding to advance research and awareness specifically related to ovarian cancer.

This initiative aimed to support investigations into various factors, including potential links between consumer products such as talcum powder and the development of ovarian cancer. The FDA's commitment to understanding and addressing women's health concerns, particularly those related to ovarian cancer, underscores the importance of regulatory efforts in safeguarding public well-being.

 

Impact on Black Women:


Research suggests a noteworthy aspect of this controversy is the potential susceptibility of black women, particularly in Africa, to the use of talcum powder as makeup on their faces.

The cultural prevalence of talcum powder as a cosmetic product in certain communities raises concerns, as black women may be exposed to talc-related risks due to beauty practices. Understanding and addressing this aspect of the issue is crucial for promoting awareness and ensuring the well-being of diverse populations.

 

Wangari Maathai's Legacy:

Wangari Maathai, the renowned Kenyan environmentalist and Nobel laureate, sadly succumbed to ovarian cancer. Her life and work underscore the importance of environmental awareness and advocacy. While not directly connected to talcum powder use, Maathai's battle with ovarian cancer serves as a poignant reminder of the impact of health challenges, urging us to delve deeper into factors contributing to such illnesses and advocate for safer practices in our daily lives.

 

Recent Lawsuits and Settlements:


Previous and ongoing talcum powder lawsuits have implicated major brands within the talc supply chain, from manufacturers such as Johnson & Johnson to suppliers.

In a recent update as of January 24, 2024, Johnson & Johnson has confirmed a tentative settlement for $700 million with 42 states' attorneys general. This settlement stems from an investigation by more than 40 U.S. states over the company's talcum powder marketing practices. According to a report by Bloomberg News, Johnson & Johnson will pay $700 million to resolve this legal matter. While the company's legal team is still finalizing the details with the state attorneys general, both sides have reportedly agreed on the settlement amount.

 

Johnson & Johnson's Asbestos Recall and Lawsuits:


In 2019, Johnson & Johnson issued a recall of 33,000 bottles of Johnson’s Baby Powder after testing found asbestos in samples. Despite denying any liability and insisting it did not sell cancer-causing products, the company halted the sale of talc-based Johnson’s Baby Powder in North America in May 2020.

Responding to consumer concerns, in 2023, Johnson & Johnson made a significant shift, switching to a cornstarch-based alternative and discontinuing worldwide sales of its talc-based Johnson’s Baby Powder.

People filing talcum powder lawsuits claim they were diagnosed with cancer after using talc-based Johnson's Baby Powder. In April 2023, Johnson & Johnson proposed an $8.9 billion bankruptcy settlement that was ultimately rejected.

As of February 2024, more than 53,000 cancer lawsuits were pending in the MDL (Multidistrict Litigation).

 

Brands and Companies Named in Lawsuits:

Other brands include Cashmere Bouquet (Colgate-Palmolive), Gold Bond Body Powder, Gold Bond Extra Strength Body Powder, Gold Bond No Mess Powder Spray, Johnson’s Baby Powder, Shower to Shower (J&J), Vanderbilt Minerals raw industrial talc, Whittaker, Clark & Daniels raw cosmetic talc.

Besides manufacturers and suppliers, plaintiffs have sued retailers for selling them products that contained asbestos.


98 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page